4.8 Article

DKK2 imparts tumor immunity evasion through beta-catenin-independent suppression of cytotoxic immune-cell activation

期刊

NATURE MEDICINE
卷 24, 期 3, 页码 262-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nm.4496

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [GM112182, CA214703]
  2. Connecticut Bioscience Innovation Fund
  3. NSFC [31530094]
  4. strategic priority research program of CAS [XDB19000000]
  5. CAS/SAFEA International Partnership Program for Creative Research Teams
  6. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA214703, P50CA196530, P30CA016359] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  7. NATIONAL CENTER FOR ADVANCING TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCES [UL1TR001863] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  8. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R35HL135805] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  9. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [T32GM007324, R01GM112182] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Immunotherapy offers new options for cancer treatment, but efficacy varies across cancer types. Colorectal cancers (CRCs) are largely refractory to immune-checkpoint blockade, which suggests the presence of yet uncharacterized immune-suppressive mechanisms. Here we report that the loss of adenomatosis polyposis coli (APC) in intestinal tumor cells or of the tumor suppressor PTEN in melanoma cells upregulates the expression of Dickkopf-related protein 2 (DKK2), which, together with its receptor LRP5, provides an unconventional mechanism for tumor immune evasion. DKK2 secreted by tumor cells acts on cytotoxic lymphocytes, inhibiting STAT5 signaling by impeding STAT5 nuclear localization via LRP5, but independently of LRP6 and the Wnt-beta-catenin pathway. Genetic or antibody-mediated ablation of DKK2 activates natural killer (NK) cells and CD8(+) T cells in tumors, impedes tumor progression, and enhances the effects of PD-1 blockade. Thus, we have identified a previously unknown tumor immune-suppressive mechanism and immunotherapeutic targets particularly relevant for CRCs and a subset of melanomas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据