4.8 Article

Wheat receptor-kinase-like protein Stb6 controls gene-for-gene resistance to fungal pathogen Zymoseptoria tritici

期刊

NATURE GENETICS
卷 50, 期 3, 页码 368-+

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41588-018-0051-x

关键词

-

资金

  1. Institute Strategic Program from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council of the UK (BBSRC) [BB/J/00426x/1, BB/P016855/1]
  2. French National Institute for Agricultural Research (INRA)
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/I000712/1, BB/J012017/1, BBS/E/C/000I0220, BBS/E/J/000PR9780, BBS/E/C/00005203, BBS/E/C/00005202, BBS/E/C/000I0250, BB/J003743/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. BBSRC [BBS/E/J/000PR8000, BBS/E/C/00005203, BBS/E/C/00005202, BBS/E/C/000I0250, BB/I000712/1, BB/I025077/1, BB/J003743/1, BBS/E/J/000PR9780, BBS/E/C/000I0220, BB/J012017/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Deployment of fast-evolving disease-resistance genes is one of the most successful strategies used by plants to fend off pathogens(1,2). In gene-for-gene relationships, most cloned disease-resistance genes encode intracellular nucleotide-binding leucine-rich-repeat proteins (NLRs) recognizing pathogen-secreted isolate-specific avirulence (Avr) effectors delivered to the host cytoplasm(3,4). This process often triggers a localized hypersensitive response, which halts further disease development(5). Here we report the map-based cloning of the wheat Stb6 gene and demonstrate that it encodes a conserved wall-associated receptor kinase (WAK)-like protein, which detects the presence of a matching apoplastic effector(6-8) and confers pathogen resistance without a hypersensitive response(9). This report demonstrates gene-for-gene disease resistance controlled by this class of proteins in plants. Moreover, Stb6 is, to our knowledge, the first cloned gene specifying resistance to Zymoseptoria tritici, an important foliar fungal pathogen affecting wheat and causing economically damaging septoria tritici blotch (STB) disease(10-12).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据