4.8 Article

Super-long single-molecule tracking reveals dynamic-anchorage-induced integrin function

期刊

NATURE CHEMICAL BIOLOGY
卷 14, 期 5, 页码 497-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41589-018-0032-5

关键词

-

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [2162, 15H04351, 16H04775, 24247029, 16H06386]
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan [15H01212]
  3. Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology (CREST) project of 'Creation of Fundamental Technologies for Understanding and Control of Biosystem Dynamics' of the Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) [JPMJCR14W2]
  4. World Premiere Research Center Initiative (WPI) of the MEXT
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17K19521, 15H01212, 16H01358, 16H04775, 17H03666, 15H04351, 16H06386] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Single-fluorescent-molecule imaging tracking (SMT) is becoming an important tool to study living cells. However, photobleaching and photoblinking (hereafter referred to as photobleaching/photoblinking) of the probe molecules strongly hamper SMT studies of living cells, making it difficult to observe in vivo molecular events and to evaluate their lifetimes (e.g., off rates). The methods used to suppress photobleaching/photoblinking in vitro are difficult to apply to living cells because of their toxicities. Here using 13 organic fluorophores we found that, by combining low concentrations of dissolved oxygen with a reducing-plus-oxidizing system, photobleaching/photoblinking could be strongly suppressed with only minor effects on cells, which enabled SMT for as long as 12,000 frames (similar to 7 min at video rate, as compared to the general 10-s-order durations) with similar to 22-nm single-molecule localization precisions. SMT of integrins revealed that they underwent temporary (<80-s) immobilizations within the focal adhesion region, which were responsible for the mechanical linkage of the actin cytoskeleton to the extracellular matrix.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据