4.8 Article

Reprogramming of H3K9me3-dependent heterochromatin during mammalian embryo development

期刊

NATURE CELL BIOLOGY
卷 20, 期 5, 页码 620-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41556-018-0093-4

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFA0100400]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31721003, 31430056, 81630035, 31401266, 31771646, 31701262, 31401247, 31501196, 31501183, 31571365, 31501197]
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2017YFA0102602, 2015CB964800]
  4. Shanghai Subject Chief Scientist Program [15XD1503500, 17XD1403600]
  5. Shanghai Rising-Star Program [17QA1402700, 17QA1404200]
  6. Shanghai Chenguang Program [16CG17, 16CG19, 15CG19]
  7. Shanghai municipal medical and health discipline construction projects [2017ZZ02015]
  8. National Postdoctoral Program for Innovative Talents [BX20170174]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

H3K9me3-dependent heterochromatin is a major barrier of cell fate changes that must be reprogrammed after fertilization. However, the molecular details of these events are lacking in early embryos. Here, we map the genome-wide distribution of H3K9me3 modifications in mouse early embryos. We find that H3K9me3 exhibits distinct dynamic features in promoters and long terminal repeats (LTRs). Both parental genomes undergo large-scale H3K9me3 reestablishment after fertilization, and the imbalance in parental H3K9me3 signals lasts until blastocyst. The rebuilding of H3K9me3 on LTRs is involved in silencing their active transcription triggered by DNA demethylation. We identify that Chaf1a is essential for the establishment of H3K9me3 on LTRs and subsequent transcriptional repression. Finally, we find that lineage-specific H3K9me3 is established in post-implantation embryos. In summary, our data demonstrate that H3K9me3-dependent heterochromatin undergoes dramatic reprogramming during early embryonic development and provide valuable resources for further exploration of the epigenetic mechanism in early embryos.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据