4.8 Article

Design of a porous cobalt sulfide nanosheet array on Ni foam from zeolitic imidazolate frameworks as an advanced electrode for supercapacitors

期刊

NANOSCALE
卷 10, 期 6, 页码 2735-2741

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7nr07931a

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21471086, 51572272]
  2. Science and Technology Department of Zhejiang Province [2017C33007]
  3. Scientific Research Foundation of the Education Department of Zhejiang Province [Y201635167]
  4. Foundation of State Key Laboratory of High-efficiency Utilization of Coal and Green Chemical Engineering [2016-09]
  5. Natural Science Foundation of Ningbo [2017A610062]
  6. K. C. Wong Magna Fund in Ningbo University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Porous nanosheet-structured electrode materials are very attractive for the high efficiency storage of electrochemical energy. Herein, a porous cobalt sulfide nanosheet array on Ni foam (Co9S8-NSA/NF) is successfully fabricated by a facile method, which involves the uniform growth of 2D Co-based leaf-like zeolitic imidazole frameworks (Co-ZIF-L) on Ni foam followed by subsequent sulfurization with thioacetamide (TAA). Benefiting from the unique porous nanosheet array architecture and conductive substrate, the Co9S8-NSA/NF exhibits excellent electrochemical performance with a high capacitance (1098.8 F g(-1) at 0.5 A g(-1)), good rate capacity (54.6% retention at 10 A g(-1)) and long-term stability (87.4% retention over 1000 cycles), when acted as a binder-free electrode for supercapacitors. Furthermore, an assembled asymmetric supercapacitor device using the as-fabricated Co9S8-NSA as the positive electrode and activated carbon (AC) as the negative electrode also exhibits a high energy density of 20.0 W h kg(-1) at a high power density of 828.5 W kg(-1). The method developed here can be extended to the construction of other structured metal (mono or mixed) sulfide electrode materials for more efficient energy storage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据