4.8 Article

CTAB-assisted growth of self-supported Zn2GeO4 nanosheet network on a conductive foam as a binder-free electrode for long-life lithium-ion batteries

期刊

NANOSCALE
卷 10, 期 3, 页码 921-929

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7nr05407f

关键词

-

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [xjj2015119]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51273158, 21303131]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2016M592776]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province [2016JM5021]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Ge-based compounds show great potential as replacements for traditional graphite anode in lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). However, large volume changes and low conductivity of such materials result in a poor electrochemical cycling and rate performance. Herein, we fabricate a self-supported and three-dimensional (3D) sponge-like structure of interlinked Zn2GeO4 ultrathin nanosheets anchored vertically on a nickel foam (ZGO NSs@NF) via a simple hydrothermal process assisted by cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB). Such robust self-supported hybrid structures greatly improve the structural tolerance of the active materials and accommodate the volume variation that occurs during repeated electrochemical cycling. As expected, the self-supported ZGO NSs@NF composites demonstrate an excellent lithium storage with a high discharge capacity, a long cycling life, and a good rate capability when used as binder-free anodes for LIBs. A high reversible discharge capacity of 794 mA h g(-1) is maintained after 500 cycles at 200 mA g(-1), corresponding to 81% capacity retention of the second cycle. Further evaluation at a higher current density (2 A g(-1)) also delivers a reversible discharge capacity (537 mA h g(-1)) for this binder-free anode. This novel 3D structure of the self-supported ultrathin nanosheets on a conductive substrate, with its volume buffer effect and good interfacial contacts, can stimulate the progress of other energy-efficient technologies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据