4.8 Article

Atomic scale reversible opto-structural switching of few atom luminescent silver clusters confined in LTA zeolites

期刊

NANOSCALE
卷 10, 期 24, 页码 11467-11476

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8nr03222j

关键词

-

资金

  1. Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) [G0990.11, G.0197.11, G.0962.13, G.0B39.15]
  2. European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7) [310651, 607417, 307523]
  3. Flemish government [METH/15/04 CASAS2]
  4. Hercules foundation [HER/11/14]
  5. Strategisch Initiatief Materialen SoPPoM program
  6. Catedras CONACYT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Luminescent silver clusters (AgCLs) stabilized inside partially Ag exchanged Na LTA zeolites show a remarkable reversible on-off switching of their green-yellowish luminescence that is easily tuned by a hydration and dehydration cycle, making them very promising materials for sensing applications. We have used a unique combination of photoluminescence (PL), UV-visible-NIR Diffuse Reflectance (DRS), X-ray absorption fine structure (XAFS), Fourier Transform-Infrared (FTIR) and electron spin resonance (ESR) spectroscopies to unravel the atomic-scale structural changes responsible for the reversible optical behavior of the confined AgCLs in LTA zeolites. Water coordinated, diamagnetic, tetrahedral AgCLs [Ag-4(H2O)(4)](2+) with Ag atoms positioned along the axis of the sodalite six-membered rings are at the origin of the broad and intense green-yellowish luminescence in the hydrated sample. Upon dehydration, luminescent [Ag-4(H2O)(4)](2+) clusters are transformed into non-luminescent (dark), diamagnetic, octahedral AgCLs [Ag-6(O-F)(14)](2+) with Ag atoms interacting strongly with zeolite framework oxygen (O-F) of the sodalite four-membered rings. This highly responsive on-off switching reveals that besides quantum confinement and molecular-size, coordinated water and framework oxygen ligands strongly affect the organization of AgCLs valence electrons and play a crucial role in the opto-structural properties of AgCLs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据