4.8 Article

A semi-permanent and durable nanoscale-crack-based sensor by on-demand healing

期刊

NANOSCALE
卷 10, 期 9, 页码 4354-4360

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7nr07696g

关键词

-

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea - Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning [NRF-2017R1D1A1B03033089, 2016R1C1B1009689]
  2. Basic Science Research Program through a National Research Foundation of Korea - Korean Government (MEST) [NRF-2017R1A5A1070259]
  3. Ajou University research fund
  4. Nature-Inspired Innovative Technology Development Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  5. Ministry of Science and ICT [NRF-2017M3C1B7014222]
  6. National Research Foundation of Korea [2017R1D1A1B03033089, 2016H1A2A1907972] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although sensitivity and durability are desirable in a sensor, both of them cannot be easily achieved. Sitespecific and effective signal acquisition on the limited area of a sensor inevitably allows fatigue accumulation and contamination. For example, an ultrasensitive nanoscale-crack-based sensor for detecting a mechanical stimulus with tremendous sensitivity (a gauge factor greater than 2000 under 2% strain), yet limited durability (up to a few thousand stretching cycles in tensile tests) has been presented previously. Herein, we suggest a simple yet robust nanoscale-crack-based sensor that achieves remarkable durability through the use of a self-healable polymer. The self-healable polymer helps the crack gap recover and maintain high stability for 1 million cycles under 2% strain. Moreover, site-specific recovery with infrared light irradiation was demonstrated with monolithic arrayed sensors. The proposed strategy provides a unique solution to achieving highly enhanced durability and high mechanosensitivity, which are typically incompatible.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据