4.8 Article

Titanium nitride hollow nanospheres with strong lithium polysulfide chemisorption as sulfur hosts for advanced lithium-sulfur batteries

期刊

NANO RESEARCH
卷 11, 期 8, 页码 4302-4312

出版社

TSINGHUA UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s12274-018-2017-9

关键词

TiN hollow spheres; lithium-sulfur batteries; polysulfide trapping; density functional theory (DFT) calculations

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [21471091]
  2. 111 Project [B12015]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds of Shandong University [2015JC007]
  4. Academy of Sciences large apparatus United Fund [11179043]
  5. Taishan Scholar Project of Shandong Province [ts201511004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lithium-sulfur batteries are promising electrochemical energy storage devices because of their high theoretical specific capacity and energy density. An ideal sulfur host should possess high conductivity and embrace the physical confinement or strong chemisorption to dramatically suppress the polysulfide dissolution. Herein, uniform TiN hollow nanospheres with an average diameter of similar to 160 nm have been reported as highly efficient lithium polysulfide reservoirs for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries. Combining the high conductivity and chemical trapping of lithium polysulfides, the obtained S/TiN cathode of 70 wt.% sulfur content in the composite delivered an excellent long-life cycling performance at 0.5C and 1.0C over 300 cycles. More importantly, a stable capacity of 710.4 mAh.g(-1) could be maintained even after 100 cycles at 0.2C with a high sulfur loading of 3.6 mg.cm(-1). The nature of the interactions between TiN and lithium polysulfide species was investigated by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy studies. Theoretical calculations were also carried out and the results revealed a strong binding between TiN and the lithium polysulfide species. It is expected that this class of conductive and polar materials would pave a new way for the high-energy lithium-sulfur batteries in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据