4.5 Article

Susceptibility of A-fumigatus-specific T-cell assays to pre-analytic blood storage and PBMC cryopreservation greatly depends on readout platform and analytes

期刊

MYCOSES
卷 61, 期 8, 页码 549-560

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/myc.12780

关键词

Aspergillus fumigatus; cryopreservation; cytokines; ELISPOT; flow cytometry; immunoassay

资金

  1. Interdisciplinary Centre for Clinical Research (IZKF) Wuerzburg [Z-3/56]
  2. Bavarian Ministry of Economics, Media, Energy and Technology [BayBIO-1606-003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mould-specific T cells detectable by flow cytometry or ELISPOT were proposed as a novel biomarker in invasive aspergillosis. To define protocols facilitating sample shipment and longitudinal analysis, this study evaluated the susceptibility of different functional assays for A. fumigatus-specific T-cell quantification and characterisation to pre-analytic delays. PBMCs from 6 healthy donors were analysed after immediate isolation, after 6hours whole blood storage or after cryopreservation using 3 different common media. Functional responses to A. fumigatus lysate stimulation were comparatively assessed by flow cytometry, ELISPOT and 14-plex cytokine assay. After 6hours pre-analytic storage, all functional assays showed reduced detection rates, higher coefficients of variation (CV) and widely varying individual recovery indices of specific T-cell response. While cryopreservation resulted in sufficient yields and largely unaltered cellular composition, outcomes of functional readouts significantly differed from freshly processed samples. For CD154-based flow cytometry, only cryopreservation in RPMI supplemented with autologous serum resulted in satisfactory detection rates and CVs. For ELISPOT and cytokine secretion assays, none of the cryopreservation protocols provided sufficient concordance with immediately processed samples. Even using the same readout platform, individual analytes widely varied in their susceptibility to cryopreservation, highlighting that distinct optimisation is required depending on the downstream assay.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据