4.7 Article

Gamma-ray and X-ray emission from the Galactic centre: hints on the nuclear star cluster formation history

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty1454

关键词

Galaxy: centre; gamma-rays: galaxies; X-rays: galaxies; cataclysmic variables; pulsars: general; dark matter

资金

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG) [Sonderforschungsbereich SFB 881]
  2. University of Rome Sapienza [52/2015]
  3. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme ERC-2014-STG [638435]
  4. Hungarian National Research, Development, and Innovation Office [NKFIH KH-125675]
  5. National Science Foundation [PHY-1607761]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Milky Way centre exhibits an intense flux in the gamma and X-ray hands, whose origin is partly ascribed to the possible presence of a large population of millisecond pulsars (MSPs) and cataclysmic variables (CVs), respectively. However, the number of sources required to generate such an excess is much larger than what is expected from in situ star formation and evolution, opening a series of questions about the formation history of the Galactic nucleus. In this paper, we make use of direct N-body simulations to investigate whether these sources could have been brought to the Galactic centre by a population of star clusters that underwent orbital decay and formed the Galactic nuclear star cluster (NSC). Our results suggest that the gamma-ray emission is compatible with a population of MSPs that were mass segregated in their parent clusters, while the X-ray emission is consistent with a population of CVs born via dynamical interactions in dense star clusters. Combining observations with our modelling, we explore how the observed gamma-ray flux can be related to different NSC formation scenarios. Finally, we show that the high-energy emission coining from the galactic central regions can be used to detect black holes heavier than 10(5) M-circle dot in nearby dwarf galaxies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据