4.6 Article

A High-Content Screen Reveals New Small-Molecule Enhancers of Ras/Mapk Signaling as Probes for Zebrafish Heart Development

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 23, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules23071691

关键词

zebrafish; high-throughput screening; high-content analysis; Cognition Network Technology; Fgf signaling; heart development; probe discovery

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 DK112652, R01 HD053287]
  2. NIGMS CMLD program [GM067082]
  3. [P30 CA047904]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Zebrafish is the preferred vertebrate model for high throughput chemical screens to discover modulators of complex biological pathways. We adapted a transgenic zebrafish line, Tg(dusp6:EGFP), which reports on fibroblast growth factor (Fgf)/Ras/Mapk activity, into a quantitative, high-content chemical screen to identify novel Fgf hyperactivators as chemical probes for zebrafish heart development and regeneration. We screened 10,000 compounds from the TimTec ActiProbe library, and identified several structurally distinct classes of molecules that enhanced Fgf/Ras/Mapk signaling. We chose three agentsST020101, ST011282, and ST006994for confirmatory and functional studies based on potency, repeatability with repurchased material, favorable whole organism toxicity, and evidence of structure-activity relationships. Functional follow-up assays confirmed that all three compounds induced the expression of Fgf target genes during zebrafish embryonic development. Moreover, these compounds increased cardiac progenitor populations by effecting a fate change from endothelial to cardiac progenitors that translated into increased numbers of cardiomyocytes. Interestingly, ST006994 augmented Fgf/Ras/Mapk signaling without increasing Erk phosphorylation, suggesting a molecular mechanism of action downstream of Erk. We posit that the ST006994 pharmacophore could become a unique chemical probe to uncover novel mechanisms of Fgf signaling during heart development and regeneration downstream of the Mapk signaling node.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据