4.8 Article

A set of regulatory genes co-expressed in embryonic human brain is implicated in disrupted speech development

期刊

MOLECULAR PSYCHIATRY
卷 24, 期 7, 页码 1065-1078

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41380-018-0020-x

关键词

-

资金

  1. Max Planck Society
  2. National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders Grant [DC000496]
  3. National Institute of Child Health and Development [HD03352]
  4. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Centre of Research Excellence in Speech and Language Neurobiology [1116976]
  5. NHMRC [1127144, 1105008, 1054618, 1102971, 1091593, 1006110]
  6. March of Dimes, United States
  7. Victorian Government's Operational Infrastructure Support Program
  8. Australian Government NHMRC Independent Research Institute Infrastructure Support Scheme (IRIISS)
  9. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [1102971] Funding Source: NHMRC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Genetic investigations of people with impaired development of spoken language provide windows into key aspects of human biology. Over 15 years after FOXP2 was identified, most speech and language impairments remain unexplained at the molecular level. We sequenced whole genomes of nineteen unrelated individuals diagnosed with childhood apraxia of speech, a rare disorder enriched for causative mutations of large effect. Where DNA was available from unaffected parents, we discovered de novo mutations, implicating genes, including CHD3, SETDJA and WDR5. In other probands, we identified novel loss-of-function variants affecting KAT6A, SETBPJ, ZFHX4, TNRC6B and MKL2, regulatory genes with links to neurodevelopment. Several of the new candidates interact with each other or with known speech-related genes. Moreover, they show significant clustering within a single co-expression module of genes highly expressed during early human brain development. This study highlights gene regulatory pathways in the developing brain that may contribute to acquisition of proficient speech.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据