4.5 Article

'Slipped Sandwich' Model for Chitin and Chitosan Perception in Arabidopsis

期刊

MOLECULAR PLANT-MICROBE INTERACTIONS
卷 31, 期 11, 页码 1145-1153

出版社

AMER PHYTOPATHOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1094/MPMI-04-18-0098-R

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [GRK 1549]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chitin, a linear polymer of N-acetyl-D-glucosamine, and chitosans, fully or partially deacetylated derivatives of chitin, are known to elicit defense reactions in higher plants. We compared the ability of chitin and chitosan oligomers and polymers (chitin oligomers with degree of polymerization [DP] 3 to 8; chitosan oligomers with degree of acetylation [DA] 0 to 35% and DP 3 to 15; chitosan polymers with DA 1 to 60% and DP approximately 1,300) to elicit an oxidative burst indicative of induced defense reactions in Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings. Fully deacetylated chitosans were not able to trigger a response; elicitor activity increased with increasing DA of chitosan polymers. Partially acetylated chitosan oligomers required a minimum DP of 6 and at least four N-acetyl groups to trigger a response. Invariably, elicitation of an oxidative burst required the presence of the chitin receptor AtCERK1. Our results as well as previously published studies on chitin and chitosan perception in plants are best explained by a new general model of LysMcontaining receptor complexes in which two partners form a long but off-set chitin-binding groove and are, thus, dimerized by one chitin or chitosan molecule, sharing a central GlcNAc unit with which both LysM domains interact. To verify this model and to distinguish it from earlier models, we assayed elicitor and inhibitor activities of selected partially acetylated chitosan oligomers with fully defined structures. In contrast to the initial 'continuous groove', the original 'sandwich', or the current 'sliding mode' models for the chitin/chitosan receptor, the here-proposed 'slipped sandwich' model-which builds on these earlier models and represents a consensus combination of these-is in agreement with all experimental observations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据