4.7 Article

Vacuole Integrity Maintained by DUF300 Proteins Is Required for Brassinosteroid Signaling Regulation

期刊

MOLECULAR PLANT
卷 11, 期 4, 页码 553-567

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.molp.2017.12.015

关键词

brassinosteroid signaling; vacuole integrity; DUF300 proteins; tonoplast; Arabidopsis

资金

  1. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU)
  2. Knut and Alice Wallenberg (KAW) Foundation [2012-0087, 2012-0050]
  3. Swedish Research Council (Vetenskapsradet, VR) [2016-04562, 2013-4632]
  4. Vinnova (Verket for Innovationssystemet)
  5. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic through the National Program of Sustainability [LO1204]
  6. BBSRC [BBS/E/J/000PR9795, BBS/E/J/000PR9796] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/E/J/000PR9796, BBS/E/J/000PR9795] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Brassinosteroid (BR) hormone signaling controls multiple processes during plant growth and development and is initiated at the plasma membrane through the receptor kinase BRASSINOSTEROID INSENSITIVE1 (BRI1) together with co-receptors such as BRI1-ASSOCIATED RECEPTOR KINASE1 (BAK1). BRI1 abundance is regulated by endosomal recycling and vacuolar targeting, but the role of vacuole-related proteins in BR receptor dynamics and BR responses remains elusive. Here, we show that the absence of two DUF300 domain-containing tonoplast proteins, LAZARUS1 (LAZ1) and LAZ1 HOMOLOG1 (LAZ1H1), causes vacuole morphology defects, growth inhibition, and constitutive activation of BR signaling. Intriguingly, tonoplast accumulation of BAK1 was substantially increased and appeared causally linked to enhanced BRI1 trafficking and degradation in laz1 laz1h1 plants. Since unrelated vacuole mutants exhibited normal BR responses, our findings indicate that DUF300 proteins play distinct roles in the regulation of BR signaling by maintaining vacuole integrity required to balance subcellular BAK1 pools and BR receptor distribution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据