4.7 Article

Detection of water absorption in the day side atmosphere of HD 189733 b using ground-based high-resolution spectroscopy at 3.2 μm

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnrasl/slt107

关键词

techniques: spectroscopic; stars: individual: HD 189733; planetary systems

资金

  1. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  2. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1108595] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report a 4.8 sigma detection of water absorption features in the day side spectrum of the hot Jupiter HD 189733 b. We used high-resolution (R similar to 100 000) spectra taken at 3.2 mu m with CRIRES on the VLT to trace the radial-velocity shift of the water features in the planet's day side atmosphere during 5 h of its 2.2 d orbit as it approached secondary eclipse. Despite considerable telluric contamination in this wavelength regime, we detect the signal within our uncertainties at the expected combination of systemic velocity (V-sys = -3(-6)(+5) km s(-1)) and planet orbital velocity (K-p = 154(-10)(+14) km s(-1)), and determine a H2O line contrast ratio of (1.3 +/- 0.2) x 10(-3) with respect to the stellar continuum. We find no evidence of significant absorption or emission from other carbon-bearing molecules, such as methane, although we do note a marginal increase in the significance of our detection to 5.1 sigma with the inclusion of carbon dioxide in our template spectrum. This result demonstrates that ground-based, high-resolution spectroscopy is suited to finding not just simple molecules like CO, but also to more complex molecules like H2O even in highly telluric contaminated regions of the Earth's transmission spectrum. It is a powerful tool that can be used for conducting an immediate census of the carbon-and oxygen-bearing molecules in the atmospheres of giant planets, and will potentially allow the formation and migration history of these planets to be constrained by the measurement of their atmospheric C/O ratios.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据