4.7 Article

Propolis from Different Geographic Origins Decreases Intestinal Inflammation and Bacteroides spp. Populations in a Model of DSS-Induced Colitis

期刊

MOLECULAR NUTRITION & FOOD RESEARCH
卷 62, 期 17, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mnfr.201800080

关键词

Bacteroides spp.; colitis; gut microbiota; polyphenols; propolis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31702287]
  2. Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program [180818]
  3. earmarked fund for Modern Agroindustry Technology Research System from the Ministry of Agriculture of China [CARS-45]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Scope: Dietary supplementation with polyphenol-rich propolis can protect against experimentally induced colitis. We examined whether different polyphenol compositions of Chinese propolis (CP) and Brazilian propolis (BP) influence their ability to protect against dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis in rats. Methods and results: HPLC-DAD/Q-TOF-MS analysis confirmed that polyphenol compositions of CP and BP were dissimilar. Rats were given CP or BP by gavage (300 mg kg(-1) body weight) throughout the study, starting 1 week prior to DSS treatment for 1 week followed by 3 d without DSS. CP and BP significantly reduced the colitis disease activity index relative to controls not receiving propolis, prevented significant DSS-induced colonic tissue damage, and increased resistance to DSS-induced colonic oxidative stress as shown by reduced malonaldehyde levels and increased T-AOC levels. CP and BP significantly reduced DSS-induced colonic apoptosis. Colonic inflammatory markers IL-1 beta, IL-6, and MCP-1 were suppressed by CP and BP, whereas only BP-induced expression of TGF-beta CP, not BP, increased the diversity and richness of gut microbiota populations. Both forms of propolis significantly reduced populations of Bacteroides spp. Conclusions: Despite the dissimilar polyphenol compositions of CP and BP, their ability to protect against DSS-induced colitis is similar. Nevertheless, some different physiological impacts were observed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据