4.5 Article

Ephrinli/EphB signaling contributes to spinal nociceptive processing via calpain-1 and caspase-3

期刊

MOLECULAR MEDICINE REPORTS
卷 18, 期 1, 页码 268-278

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2018.8996

关键词

ephrinB/EphB; spinal nociceptive; calpain-1; caspase-3; synaptic plasticity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81371253, 81171054]
  2. Shanghai Education Innovation Fund Project [1477083]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Previous studies have indicated that an important subfamily of receptor tyrosine kinases, ephrins and their receptors, are important in pain signaling, particularly in spinal nociceptive processing. In the present study, the role of the ephrin/Eph signaling pathway was confirmed, and it was shown that this signaling was also involved in spinal nociceptive processing through the actions of calpain-1 and caspase-3. First, the ephrinB ligands, ephrinBl-Fc or ephrinB2-Fc, were introduced into experimental mice via intrathecal injection, and it was found that this injection induced marked time- and dose-dependent mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia, accompanied by increased levels of calpain-1 and caspase-3 in the spinal cord. MDL28170, an inhibitor of calpain-1, reversed the behavioral effects and ameliorated the increases in calpain-1 and caspase-3. Second, it was found that the administration of EphB1 between L5 and L6 in mice inhibited the mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia induced by chronic constrictive injury. In addition, to demonstrate the cell phenotypes responsible for the increased levels of calpain-1 and caspase-3 in the spinal cord following injection with ephrinB2-Fc, double immunofluorescent labeling was performed, which indicated that calpain-1 and caspase-3 were localized in neurons, but not in astrocytes or microglial cells. In conclusion, the present study suggested that ephrinB/EphB signaling contributes to spinal nociceptive processing via the actions of calpain-1 and caspase-3.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据