4.5 Article

Dexmedetomidine impairs P-glycoprotein-mediated efflux function in L02 cells via the adenosine 5-monophosphate-activated protein kinase/nuclear factor-B pathway

期刊

MOLECULAR MEDICINE REPORTS
卷 17, 期 4, 页码 5049-5056

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2018.8549

关键词

dexmedetomidine; P-glycoprotein; L02; AMPK pathway; NF-kappa B

资金

  1. Zhejiang Provincial Health and Family Planning Commission [201462420]
  2. Zhejiang Provincial Science and Technology Department [2017C37127]
  3. Science and Technology Department of Wenzhou City [2015Y0277/Y20140249]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dexmedetomidine (DEX) a type of the anaesthetic that has been widely used in anaesthesia and intensive care. However, whether DEX affects the pharmacokinetics of drugs remains elusive. As hepatic P-glycoprotein (P-gp) serves a critical role in the disposition of drugs, the present study aimed to address whether P-gp function could be affected by DEX in vitro. In the present study, L02 cells (a normal human liver cell line) were exposed to DEX for 24 h and P-gp function was evaluated by the intracellular accumulation of Rhodamine 123. The results indicated that P-gp function was significantly impaired by DEX treatment and that the mRNA levels and protein levels of P-gp were downregulated in a dose- and time-dependent manner. Importantly, DEX-induced downregulation of P-gp was associated with adenosine 5-monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activation, as it was significantly attenuated by AMPK inhibition using dorsomorphin. Furthermore, the results revealed that changes in the subcellular localisation of nuclear factor (NF)-B following AMPK activation were involved in the P-gp regulation in response to DEX treatment. Collectively, these results suggested that DEX impairs P-glycoprotein-mediated efflux function in L02 cells via the AMPK/NF-B pathway, which provided direct evidence that the hepatic disposition of drugs may be affected by DEX through the downregulation of P-gp.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据