4.7 Article

Long-term insitu persistence of biodiversity in tropical sky islands revealed by landscape genomics

期刊

MOLECULAR ECOLOGY
卷 27, 期 2, 页码 432-448

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/mec.14461

关键词

aggregate site frequency spectrum; alpine; Berberis alpina; biodiversity distribution; Juniperus monticola; Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt

资金

  1. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia [178245, 213538]
  2. Society for the Study of Evolution
  3. National Science Foundation [DEB-1253710, DEB-1343578]
  4. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo [BIOTA, 2013/50297-0]
  5. NASA through the Dimensions of Biodiversity Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tropical mountains are areas of high species richness and endemism. Two historical phenomena may have contributed to this: (i) fragmentation and isolation of habitats may have promoted the genetic differentiation of populations and increased the possibility of allopatric divergence and speciation and (ii) the mountain areas may have allowed long-term population persistence during global climate fluctuations. These two phenomena have been studied using either species occurrence data or estimating species divergence times. However, only few studies have used intraspecific genetic data to analyse the mechanisms by which endemism may emerge at the microevolutionary scale. Here, we use landscape analysis of genomic SNP data sampled from two high-elevation plant species from an archipelago of tropical sky islands (the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt) to test for population genetic differentiation, synchronous demographic changes and habitat persistence. We show that genetic differentiation can be explained by the degree of glacial habitat connectivity among mountains and that mountains have facilitated the persistence of populations throughout glacial/interglacial cycles. Our results support the ongoing role of tropical mountains as cradles for biodiversity by uncovering cryptic differentiation and limits to gene flow.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据