4.8 Article

The Augmented R-Loop Is a Unifying Mechanism for Myelodysplastic Syndromes Induced by High-Risk Splicing Factor Mutations

期刊

MOLECULAR CELL
卷 69, 期 3, 页码 412-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.12.029

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFA0504400]
  2. NIH [HG004650, GM049369, GM052872, DK098808]
  3. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P30CA008748] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE [R01HG004659] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [R01DK098808] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  6. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [R01GM049369, R01GM052872] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mutations in several general pre-mRNA splicing factors have been linked to myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) and solid tumors. These mutations have generally been assumed to cause disease by the resultant splicing defects, but different mutations appear to induce distinct splicing defects, raising the possibility that an alternative common mechanism is involved. Here we report a chain of events triggered by multiple splicing factor mutations, especially high-risk alleles in SRSF2 and U2AF1, including elevated R-loops, replication stress, and activation of the ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related protein (ATR)-Chk1 pathway. We further demonstrate that enhanced R-loops, opposite to the expectation from gained RNA binding with mutant SRSF2, result from impaired transcription pause release because the mutant protein loses its ability to extract the RNA polymerase II (Pol II) C-terminal domain (CTD) kinase-the positive transcription elongation factor complex (P-TEFb)-from the 7SK complex. Enhanced R-loops are linked to compromised proliferation of bone-marrow-derived blood progenitors, which can be partially rescued by RNase H overexpression, suggesting a direct contribution of augmented R-loops to the MDS phenotype.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据