4.8 Article

HIV-TRACE (TRAnsmission Cluster Engine) a Tool for Large Scale Molecular Epidemiology of HIV-1 and Other Rapidly Evolving Pathogens

期刊

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
卷 35, 期 7, 页码 1812-1819

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msy016

关键词

molecular epidemiology; HIV; network; transmission cluster; surveillance

资金

  1. NIH/NIAID [R01 AI134384]
  2. NIH/NIGMS [R01 GM093939, U01 GM110749]
  3. NIH-NIAID Career Development Award [K01AI110181]
  4. California HIV/AIDS Research Program [ID15-SD- 052]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In modern applications of molecular epidemiology, genetic sequence data are routinely used to identify clusters of transmission in rapidly evolving pathogens, most notably HIV-1. Traditional 'shoe-leather' epidemiology infers transmission clusters by tracing chains of partners sharing epidemiological connections (e.g., sexual contact). Here, we present a computational tool for identifying a molecular transmission analog of such clusters: HIV-TRACE (TRAnsmission Cluster Engine). HIV-TRACE implements an approach inspired by traditional epidemiology, by identifying chains of partners whose viral genetic relatedness imply direct or indirect epidemiological connections. Molecular transmission clusters are constructed using codon-aware pairwise alignment to a reference sequence followed by pairwise genetic distance estimation among all sequences. This approach is computationally tractable and is capable of identifying HIV-1 transmission clusters in large surveillance databases comprising tens or hundreds of thousands of sequences in near real time, that is, on the order of minutes to hours. HIV-TRACE is available at www.hivtrace.org and from www.github.com/veg/hivtrace, along with the accompanying result visualization module from www.github.com/veg/hivtrace-viz. Importantly, the approach underlying HIV-TRACE is not limited to the study of HIV-1 and can be applied to study outbreaks and epidemics of other rapidly evolving pathogens.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据