4.6 Review

Single-cell RNA sequencing: Technical advancements and biological applications

期刊

MOLECULAR ASPECTS OF MEDICINE
卷 59, 期 -, 页码 36-46

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mam.2017.07.003

关键词

-

资金

  1. EU Joint Programme for Neurodegenerative Disease (JPND) [529-2014-7500]
  2. Swedish Medical Research Council [2016-02112]
  3. Ahlen-stiftelsen [MA1/h16]
  4. Birgit Backmark's Donation
  5. Parkinsonfonden [910/16]
  6. Ulla-Carin Lindquists stiftelse
  7. NEURO Sweden
  8. Magnus Bergvalls stiftelse [2016-01531]
  9. Strategic Research Area Neuroscience (StratNeuro)
  10. Swedish Research Council [E0287001]
  11. Svenska Sallskapet for Medicinska Forskning (SSMF)
  12. Jeanssons Stiftelser
  13. Ake Wiberg Stiftelser [M16-0015]
  14. Karolinska Institutet Foundation [2016fobi47682]
  15. Vinnova [2016-02112] Funding Source: Vinnova
  16. Formas [2016-02112] Funding Source: Formas
  17. Swedish Research Council [2016-02112] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cells are the basic building blocks of organisms and each cell is unique. Single-cell RNA sequencing has emerged as an indispensable tool to dissect the cellular heterogeneity and decompose tissues into cell types and/or cell states, which offers enormous potential for de novo discovery. Single-cell transcriptomic atlases provide unprecedented resolution to reveal complex cellular events and deepen our understanding of biological systems. In this review, we summarize and compare single-cell RNA sequencing technologies, that were developed since 2009, to facilitate a well-informed choice of method. The applications of these methods in different biological contexts are also discussed. We anticipate an ever-increasing role of single-cell RNA sequencing in biology with further improvement in providing spatial information and coupling to other cellular modalities. In the future, such biological findings will greatly benefit medical research. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据