4.5 Article

Combining higher-order resummation with multiple NLO calculations and parton showers in GENEVA

期刊

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
卷 -, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP09(2013)120

关键词

Monte Carlo Simulations; NLO Computations

资金

  1. Department of Energy [DE-PS02-09ER09-26]
  2. US Department of Energy [DE-FGO2-96ER40956]
  3. DFG [TA 867/1-1]
  4. National Science Foundation [NSF-PHY-0705682, NSF-PHY-0969510]
  5. Office of Science, Office of High Energy Physics of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  6. Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We extend the lowest-order matching of tree-level matrix elements with parton showers to give a complete description at the next higher perturbative accuracy in alpha(s) at both small and large jet resolutions, which has not been achieved so far. This requires the combination of the higher-order resummation of large Sudakov logarithms at small values of the jet resolution variable with the full next-to-leading-order (NLO) matrix-element corrections at large values. As a by-product, this combination naturally leads to a smooth connection of the NLO calculations for different jet multiplicities. In this paper, we focus on the general construction of our method and discuss its application to e(+)e(-) and pp collisions. We present first results of the implementation in the G en e v a Monte Carlo framework. We employ N-jettiness as the jet resolution variable, combining its next-to-next-to-leading logarithmic resummation with fully exclusive NLO matrix elements, and PYTHIA 8 as the backend for further parton showering and hadronization. For hadronic collisions, we take Drell-Yan production as an example to apply our construction. For e(+)e(-) -> jets, taking alpha(s) (m(Z)) = 0.1135 from fits to LEP thrust data, together with the PYTHIA 8 hadronization model, we obtain good agreement with LEP data for a variety of 2-jet observables.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据