4.5 Article

The RNA Methyltransferase Complex of WTAP, METTL3, and METTL14 Regulates Mitotic Clonal Expansion in Adipogenesis

期刊

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY
卷 38, 期 16, 页码 -

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.00116-18

关键词

adipocyte; diabetes; obesity

资金

  1. Translational Systems Biology and Medicine Initiative from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan
  3. Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare
  4. Japan Foundation for Applied Enzymology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adipocyte differentiation is regulated by various mechanisms, of which mitotic clonal expansion (MCE) is a key step. Although this process is known to be regulated by cell cycle modulators, the precise mechanism remains unclear. N-6-Methyladenosine (m(6)A) posttranscriptional RNA modification, whose methylation and demethylation are performed by respective enzyme molecules, has recently been suggested to be involved in the regulation of adipogenesis. Here, we show that an RNA N-6-adenosine methyltransferase complex consisting of Wilms' tumor 1-associating protein (WTAP), methyltransferase like 3 (METTL3), and METTL14 positively controls adipogenesis by promoting cell cycle transition in MCE during adipogenesis. WTAP, coupled with METTL3 and METTL14, is increased and distributed in nucleus by the induction of adipogenesis dependently on RNA in vitro. Knockdown of each of these three proteins leads to cell cycle arrest and impaired adipogenesis associated with suppression of cyclin A2 upregulation during MCE, whose knockdown also impairs adipogenesis. Consistent with this, Wtap heterozygous knockout mice are protected from diet-induced obesity with smaller size and number of adipocytes, leading to improved insulin sensitivity. These data provide a mechanism for adipogenesis through the WTAP-METTL3-METTL14 complex and a potential strategy for treatment of obesity and associated disorders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据