4.4 Article

Direct prediction of the solute softening-to-hardening transition in W-Re alloys using stochastic simulations of screw dislocation motion

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1361-651X/aaaecf

关键词

body-centered cubic metals; screw dislocations; kinetic monte carlo; W-Re; solute softening

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [DMR-1611342]
  2. US Department of Energy's Office of Fusion Energy Sciences [DE-SC0012774:0001]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0012774] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
  4. Division Of Materials Research
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1611342] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Interactions among dislocations and solute atoms are the basis of several important processes in metal plasticity. In body-centered cubic (bcc) metals and alloys, low-temperature plastic flow is controlled by screw dislocation glide, which is known to take place by the nucleation and sideward relaxation of kink pairs across two consecutive Peierls valleys. In alloys, dislocations and solutes affect each other's kinetics via long-range stress field coupling and short-range inelastic interactions. It is known that in certain substitutional bcc alloys a transition from solute softening to solute hardening is observed at a critical concentration. In this paper, we develop a kinetic Monte Carlo model of screw dislocation glide and solute diffusion in substitutional W-Re alloys. We find that dislocation kinetics is governed by two competing mechanisms. At low solute concentrations, nucleation is enhanced by the softening of the Peierls stress, which dominates over the elastic repulsion of Re atoms on kinks. This trend is reversed at higher concentrations, resulting in a minimum in the flow stress that is concentration and temperature dependent. This minimum marks the transition from solute softening to hardening, which is found to be in reasonable agreement with experiments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据