4.5 Article

Optimal and Elastic Energy Trading for Green Microgrids: a two-Layer Game Approach

期刊

MOBILE NETWORKS & APPLICATIONS
卷 24, 期 3, 页码 950-961

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11036-018-1027-x

关键词

Microgrid; Energy trading; Non-cooperative game; Stackelberg game

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation (NSF) of China [61501127]
  2. NSF of China [61422201, 61370159]
  3. NSF of Guangdong [2016A030313705]
  4. Special Fund for Applied Science and Technology (ST) of Guangdong [2015B010129001, 2014B090907010, 2015B010106010]
  5. Fund for S&T Talents of Guangdong [2014TQ01X100]
  6. Guangzhou Fund for Zhujiang ST New Stars [2014J2200097]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Energy trading mechanism for microgrids has an inherent two-layer architecture, in which the energy trading at the first layer is between a microgrid aggregator and consumers (e.g., households) within a microgrid, and the second layer is referred to as the wide area energy trading among multiple microgrids. This paper employs a two-layer game approach to achieve optimal and elastic energy trading for microgrids and improve utilization of green energy. First, a non-cooperative game is developed inside a microgrid, in which the relationship among household users is non-cooperative, and they adjust load schedules to optimize their utilities while trading energy with the microgrid aggregator. Second, a multileader-multifollower Stackelberg game is employed for the energy trading among microgrids. The role of a microgrid (as an energy buyer or seller) in the energy market is based on the result of the first game, and it can elastically adjust its energy trading strategy by charging or discharging the energy storage device. The existence and uniqueness of the equilibriums for the two games are proven. We also present algorithms that can reach the equilibriums where players achieve optimal utilities. Simulation results show that the proposed two-layer energy trading is able to significantly improve the utilization of microgrids' green energy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据