4.8 Article

Significant Reduction in End-Stage Liver Diseases Burden Through the National Viral Hepatitis Therapy Program in Taiwan

期刊

HEPATOLOGY
卷 61, 期 4, 页码 1154-1162

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/hep.27630

关键词

-

资金

  1. Health Promotion Administration
  2. Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan
  3. Academia Sinica

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A national viral hepatitis therapy program was launched in Taiwan in October 2003. This study aimed to assess the impact of the program on reduction of end-stage liver disease (ESLD) burden. Profiles of national registries of households, cancers, and death certificates were used to derive incidence and mortality of ESLDs from 2000 to 2011. Age-gender-adjusted incidence and mortality rates of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and chronic liver diseases (CLDs) and cirrhosis of adults ages 30-69 years were compared before and after launching the program using Poisson's regression models. A total of 157,570 and 61,823 patients (15%-25% of those eligible for reimbursed treatment) received therapy for chronic hepatitis B and C, respectively, by 2011. There were 42,526 CLDs and cirrhosis deaths, 47,392 HCC deaths, and 74,832 incident HCC cases occurred in 140,814,448 person-years from 2000 to 2011. Male gender and elder age were associated with a significantly increased risk of CLDs and cirrhosis and HCC. Mortality and incidence rates of ESLDs decreased continuously from 2000 to 2003 (before therapy program) through 2004-2007 to 2008-2011 in all age and gender groups. The age-gender-adjusted rate ratio (95% confidence interval; P value) in 2008-2011 was 0.78 (0.76-0.80; P<0.001) for CLDs and cirrhosis mortality, 0.76 (0.75-0.78; P<0.005) for HCC mortality, and 0.86 (0.85-0.88; P<0.005) for HCC incidence using 2000-2003 as the reference period (rate ratio=1.0). Conclusions: The national viral hepatitis therapy program has significantly reduced the mortality of CLDs and cirrhosis and incidence and mortality of HCC. (Hepatology 2015;61:1154-1162)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据