4.0 Article Proceedings Paper

Non-invasive Dual-Channel Broadband Diffuse Optical Spectroscopy of Massive Hemorrhage and Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) in Swine

期刊

MILITARY MEDICINE
卷 183, 期 -, 页码 150-156

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usx163

关键词

-

资金

  1. AFOSR [FA9550-14-1-0034]
  2. National Institutes of Health [P41EB015890]
  3. Laser Microbeam and Medical Program (LAMMP)
  4. Arnold and Mabel Beckman Foundation
  5. Telemedicine and Advanced Technologies Research Center, Fort Detrick, MD

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To quantitatively measure tissue composition and hemodynamics during resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) in two tissue compartments using non-invasive two-channel broadband diffuse optical spectroscopy (DOS). Methods: Tissue concentrations of oxy- and deoxyhemoglobin (HbO(2) and HbR), water, and lipid were measured in a porcine model (n = 10) of massive hemorrhage (65% total blood volume over 1 h) and 30-min REBOA superior and inferior to the aortic balloon. Results: After hemorrhage, hemoglobin oxygen saturation (StO(2) = HbO(2)/[HbO(2) + HbR]) at both sites decreased significantly (-29.9% and -42.3%, respectively). The DOS measurements correlated with mean arterial pressure (MAP) (R-2 = 0.79, R-2 = 0.88), stroke volume (SV) (R-2 = 0.68, R-2 = 0.88), and heart rate (HR) (R-2 = 0.72, R-2 = 0.88). During REBOA, inferior StO(2) continued to decline while superior StO(2) peaked 12min after REBOA before decreasing again. Inferior DOS parameters did not associate with MAP, SV, or HR during REBOA. Conclusions: Dual-channel regional tissue DOS measurements can be used to non-invasively track the formation of hemodynamically distinct tissue compartments during hemorrhage and REBOA. Conventional systemic measures MAP, HR, and SV are uncorrelated with tissue status in inferior (downstream) sites. Multi-compartment DOS may provide a more complete picture of the efficacy of REBOA and similar resuscitation procedures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据