4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Characteristics of Li-ion micro batteries fully batch fabricated by micro-fluidic MEMS packaging

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00542-018-3933-z

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Union [FP7 604093]
  2. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research [13GW0083C, 03SF0486]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A cost-effective and reliable technology has been developed to miniaturize batteries into glass chips and electronic packages. Lithium-ion micro-batteries were fabricated using a dispense-print process and compared to traditional stacked electrodes. The use of interdigitated electrodes allowed for easier fabrication and similar performance to conventional configurations.
A cost-effective and reliable technology allowing extreme miniaturization of batteries into glass chips and electronic packages has been developed, employing a dispense-print process for battery electrodes and liquid electrolyte. Lithium-ion micro-batteries (active area 6 x 8 mm(2), 0.15-0.3 mAh) with interdigitated electrodes were fabricated, tested and finally compared with the traditional battery architecture of stacked electrodes. Commercial graphite and lithium titanate anode as well as layered nickel cathode materials were used. All the processes for the micro-battery fabrication were established during this work; in particular the micro fluidic electrolyte filling process that allows simultaneous electrolyte supply to all cells on a planar substrate. Electrode mass reproducibility was sufficient for adequate electrode balancing. Current capability similar to the conventional face-to-face electrode configuration was achieved with interdigital electrodes that can be fabricated much easily on a substrate level. The cells were successfully cycled; several 100 cycles can be achieved. Additional results of life-time characteristics and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy are presented as well. These rechargeable micro-batteries can be used for future extremely miniaturized electronic products.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据