4.7 Article

CO2 adsorption behavior of amine-functionalized ZIF-8, graphene oxide, and ZIF-8/graphene oxide composites under dry and wet conditions

期刊

MICROPOROUS AND MESOPOROUS MATERIALS
卷 267, 期 -, 页码 53-67

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2018.03.012

关键词

Adsorption; Metal organic frameworks; Functionalization; Graphene oxide; MOF/GO; ZIF-8; Carbon dioxide

资金

  1. Abu Dhabi National Oil Company RD division [RDProj.018-GP]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Development and optimization of solid adsorbents is highly sought after toward establishment of energy-efficient and high-throughput CO2 capture processes in industry. Herein, graphene oxide (GO), zeolitic imidazolate framework ZIF-8, and composite ZIP-8/GO adsorbents were developed and further functionalized using various amine functionalities, namely, 3-aminopropyl-triethoxysilane (APTES), polyethyleneimine (PEI), and ethylene diamine (ED). Following structural and morphological evaluation, the resulting adsorbents were tested and compared for CO2 adsorption capacity and kinetics, while their performance under the presence of pre-adsorbed water was evaluated as well. GO functionalization by APTES resulted in a 36% increase in adsorption capacity at 1 bar and 30 degrees C compared to unmodified GO, and a further 33% increase under the presence of pre-adsorbed water (10% RH) compared to the corresponding APTES-GO capacity under dry conditions. Amine functionalization of ZIF-8 resulted in a capacity increase of up to 43% at 1 bar compared to unmodified ZIF-8, while ZIF-8/GO post-functionalization in water enhanced the capacity of this type of composite adsorbent compared to non-functionalized ZIF-8/GO and the pure ZIF-8 particularly at lower pressures. The reported results can be valuable towards devising optimum paths of functionalization and performance enhancement of these types of adsorbents that can pave the way toward design of highly efficient materials and processes for the current and future CO2 capture needs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据