4.7 Article

High CO2 adsorption capacities in UiO type MOFs comprising heterocyclic ligand

期刊

MICROPOROUS AND MESOPOROUS MATERIALS
卷 256, 期 -, 页码 25-31

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2017.07.051

关键词

CO2 capture; MOF; Heterocyclic ligand; Working capacity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51676079, 51661145010]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province [2015CFA046]
  3. Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Coal Combustion [FSKLCCB1701]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

For equilibrium-based CO2 capture, a high CO2 adsorption amount and working capacity of adsorbents to fulfill different conditions are desired. In this work, we investigated the CO2 adsorption in four UiO type MOFs comprising N, S, and O heterocyclic ligands. Our grand canonic Monte Carlo (GCMC) simulation results show that the CO2 adsorption amount in MOFs comprising N (UiO(BPYDC)), S (Zr-BTDC), and O (Zr-BFDC) heterocyclic ligands is higher than that in their parent MOF, UiO-67. The MOFs comprising O heterocyclic ligand (Zr-BFDC) shows the highest CO2 adsorption amount, which is 4 times higher than that of UiO-67 at 1 bar. In addition, we also found that by changing the heteroatoms on the ligands, the CO2 worldng capacity can be precisely tuned. For post-combustion CO2 capture, Zr-BFDC shows the highest working capacity due to the relative steepness isotherms. However, for syngas purification, due to the higher partial pressure of CO2, the relative steepness of the CO2 isotherms for Zr-BFDC is less of an advantage, resulting in working capacities that are less than those of Zr-BTDC and UiO(BPYDC). For biogas stream purification, UiO(BPYDC) shows the highest working capacity. Furthermore, density functional theory (DFF) calculations revealed that the incorporation of heteroatoms alters the distribution of charge in the system, introducing regions of negative charge around heteroatoms, leading to enhanced interactions between framework atoms and CO2 molecules. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据