4.1 Review

The yin and yang of KV channels in cerebral small vessel pathologies

期刊

MICROCIRCULATION
卷 25, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/micc.12436

关键词

CADASIL; cerebral blood flow; cerebral small vessel disease; subarachnoid hemorrhage; voltage-gated potassium channel

资金

  1. Scientist Development Grant [14SDG20150027]
  2. American Heart Association [17GRNT33700280]
  3. Totman Medical Research Trust
  4. Fondation Leducq
  5. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [666881]
  6. National Institutes of Health [P01-HL-095488, R01-HL-121706, R37-DK-053832, 7UM-HL-1207704, R01-HL-131181, R01-HL-136636]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cerebral SVDs encompass a group of genetic and sporadic pathological processes leading to brain lesions, cognitive decline, and stroke. There is no specific treatment for SVDs, which progress silently for years before becoming clinically symptomatic. Here, we examine parallels in the functional defects of PAs in CADASIL, a monogenic form of SVD, and in response to SAH, a common type of hemorrhagic stroke that also targets the brain microvasculature. Both animal models exhibit dysregulation of the voltage-gated potassium channel, K(V)1, in arteriolar myocytes, an impairment that compromises responses to vasoactive stimuli and impacts CBF autoregulation and local dilatory responses to neuronal activity (NVC). However, the extent to which this channelopathy-like defect ultimately contributes to these pathologies is unknown. Combining experimental data with computational modeling, we describe the role of K(V)1 channels in the regulation of myocyte membrane potential at rest and during the modest increase in extracellular potassium associated with NVC. We conclude that PA resting membrane potential and myogenic tone depend strongly on K(V)1.2/1.5 channel density, and that reciprocal changes in K-V channel density in CADASIL and SAH produce opposite effects on extracellular potassium-mediated dilation during NVC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据