4.7 Article

A nanocomposite prepared from a polypyrrole deep eutectic solvent and coated onto the inner surface of a steel capillary for electrochemically controlled microextraction of acidic drugs such as losartan

期刊

MICROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 185, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00604-018-2684-y

关键词

Anionic drugs; Electrochemically controlled in-tube solid phase microextraction; Electrochemical deposition; High performance liquid chromatography; Steel capillary; Plasma; Urine

资金

  1. Tarbiat Modares University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The authors describe a new coating for use in electrochemically controlled in-tube solid phase microextraction (EC-IT-SPME). It consists of a nanocomposite that was prepared from polypyrrole and deep eutectic solvent (DES) by electrochemical deposition on the inner walls of a stainless steel capillary that serves as a working electrode. The hypertension drug losartan acts as an acidic model analyte. The extraction efficiency, mechanical stability, chemical stability and lifetime of the coating were investigated. It is found to be quite stable in relatively acidic and basic media and to be re-usable >450 times without decrease in extraction efficiency. Its extraction capability in comparison to the commercial polypyrrole coating is better by a factor of 1.5. The coated steel capillary was used as the anode (anion-exchanger), and a platinum electrode was used as the cathode. By passing a sample solution through the electrode, losartan can be extracted by applying a positive potential to the flow. In the next step, losartan is electrochemically desorbed and subjected to HPLC analysis with UV detection. Under optimal conditions, losartan can be quantified with limits of detection that range from 50 to 500 ng L-1 depending on the sample matrix. Response is linear in the 0.1-500 mu g L-1 concentration range. The inter-and intra-assay precisions (RSDs; in %, for n = 3) are in the range from 2.4-4.6% and from 1.9-3.9%, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据