4.7 Article

Magnetic solid-phase extraction using MIL-101 (Cr)-based composite combined with dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction based on solidification of a floating organic droplet for the determination of pyrethroids in environmental water and tea samples

期刊

MICROCHEMICAL JOURNAL
卷 137, 期 -, 页码 449-455

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2017.12.009

关键词

MOF-based composite; Magnetic solid phase extraction; Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction based on the solidification of floating organic drop; Pyrethroid residues; Gas chromatography

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An efficient magnetic metal-organic framework (MOF) material MIL-101(Cr)-based composite (MIL, Material Institute Lavoisier) was applied as a sorbent for magnetic solid phase extraction (MSPE) coupled with dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction based on the solidification of floating organic drop (DLLME-SFO) method of trace pyrethroids in environmental water and tea samples. Target analytes were quantified by gas chromatography electron capture detection (GC-ECD). The variables influencing the performance of both steps, including amount of MIL-101 (Cr)-based composite, pH value, ultrasound extraction time, elution solvent, elution/disperser solvent volume, elution time and extraction solvent volume, were systematically investigated. The characteristics of the analytical method were evaluated. A linearity range (r = 0.9989-0.9997) was obtained in the range of 0.05-10.0 ng/mL. Excellent sensitivity levels were achieved with the detection limits of 0.008-0.015 ng/mL and the quantitation limits of 0.028-0.050 ng/mL. Under optimal conditions, the method was successfully established for the determination of pyrethroids in real samples with satisfactory recoveries ranging from 78.3-103.6%. Overall, the encouraging method exhibited the advantages of remarkable sensitivity, ease of operation, rapidity, low cost and environmental friendliness. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据