4.7 Article

The green grass was never green: How spectroscopic techniques should have assisted restoration works

期刊

MICROCHEMICAL JOURNAL
卷 138, 期 -, 页码 154-161

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2018.01.010

关键词

Raman spectroscopy; EDXRF; SEM-EDX; wall paintings; Pigments; Conservation state

资金

  1. Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO)
  2. European Regional Development Fund (FEDER) [DISILICA-1930, BIA2014-59124-P]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents the results of a multidisciplinary research based on the use of different diagnostic techniques for the study of wall paintings that belong to the late Gothic period and are preserved in the church of Saint Stephen in Ribera de Valderejo (Alava, Basque Country). Portable Raman and X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy measurements carried out in-situ allowed to characterize the plaster composition, the colour palette used by the artists and the materials employed during the restoration works in recent times. The analyses were focused especially on some areas that appear unusually grey. Apparently, the results obtained by both techniques seem to be contradictory and it was necessary to perform a selective sampling in some areas of interest which were analyzed in the laboratory. Raman spectroscopy and scanning electron microscope, coupled with energy dispersive X spectroscopy, applied on the cross-section of micro samples, made possible to clarify some important issues, showing the inadequacy of the restoration works carried out in previous years and the presence of a potentially dangerous material too (magnesium arsenate), whose use was not documented. The results demonstrated the importance of using diagnostic tools for the identification of the materials belonging to Cultural Heritage, especially before restoration works in order to choose the most appropriate methodology and to respect the original appearance of the paintings. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据