4.7 Article

Development of an electrochemical method for the detection of quinolones: Application to cladoceran ecotoxicity studies

期刊

MICROCHEMICAL JOURNAL
卷 141, 期 -, 页码 279-286

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2018.05.039

关键词

Anodic stripping voltammetry; Bismuth electrode; Quinolone; Daphnia magna; Ceriodaphnia dubia; Ecotoxicity test

资金

  1. UNL [UNL 634/17, PI 50120150100001LI, PI 50120150100130LI, PI 50020150100068LI]
  2. Agencia Santafesina de Ciencia, Tecnologia e Innovacion: ASaCTeI [2010-092-16]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work presents the development of a sensitive and friendly environment electrochemical methodology with high analytical performance for quinolone detection. The method is based on square-wave anodic stripping voltammetry which is simple and reliable for determination of quinolone family on the bismuth film electrode (BiFE). The deposition potential, deposition time, buffer solution pH, voltammetry detection technique and bismuth concentration at fixed quinolone concentration (1 mu g L-1) were evaluated by fractionated factorial and central composite designs. The high cross-reactivity obtained in the evaluation of different quinolones showed that this methodology could be applied to quinolone family with limits of detection (LOD) close to 0.5 ng L-1. Since is widely known that quinolones can reach aquatic ecosystems, the developed electroanalytical method was applied in the monitoring of moxifloxacin (MOXI) concentrations in ecotoxicity studies by means of acute toxicity test using two cladoceran species as biological models: Daphnia magna and Ceriodaphnia dubia. As a result of ecotoxicity, both species showed comparable sensitivities at MOXI. Toxicity studies of quinolones on aquatic organisms are very limited so the effects of MOXI to cladoceran species are highlighted. The interaction of both disciplines -Chemistry and Ecology- would allow knowing of global behavior of quinolones in natural environments, from an integrative perspective.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据