4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Environmental risk assessment of human and veterinary medicinal products - Challenges and ways of improvement

期刊

MICROCHEMICAL JOURNAL
卷 136, 期 -, 页码 67-70

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2017.08.012

关键词

Environmental risk assessment; Medicinal product; Challenges; Recommendations for improvement

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Assessment of the environmental impact, the risk posed by application of medicinal products for human and veterinary use is a legal obligation, and must be performed to evaluate and limit potential adverse effects of medicines on the environment. An environmental risk assessment (ERA) is performed in a stepwise approach in European Union, which starts with an initial screening phase (Phase I), aimed at identifying the environmental exposure of pharmaceuticals based on their potential for bioaccumulation and persistence in the environment. If, following this preliminary assessment, significant environmental exposure is anticipated, or if specific risks are identified due to compound -specific characteristics, a number of studies should be performed (Phase II) based on the guidance documents issued by European Medicines Agency (EMA). The Phase II tests identify the fate of medicinal products in the environment and their potential effects on representative organisms (e.g. fish or daphnids, for the aquatic environment). For this purpose, the results of various internationally accepted test methodologies (laid down mainly by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)) form the basis of the risk-assessment process, which may be further extended on a case-by-case basis, depending on the outcome of the assessment. However, several studies have been published revealing considerable residue levels in surface waters, in rivers and lakes throughout Europe that rise the question whether the current legislation and environmental risk assessment system of human and veterinary medicinal products are sufficiently protective. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据