4.2 Review

Encystation: the most prevalent and underinvestigated differentiation pathway of eukaryotes

期刊

MICROBIOLOGY-SGM
卷 164, 期 5, 页码 727-739

出版社

MICROBIOLOGY SOC
DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.000653

关键词

Encystment; Entamoeba; Acanthamoeba; Dictyostelium; cyclic AMP signalling; histidine kinase

资金

  1. ERC [742288]
  2. Wellcome [100293/Z/12/Z]
  3. Wellcome Trust [100293/Z/12/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust
  4. European Research Council (ERC) [742288] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Not long ago, protists were considered one of four eukaryote kingdoms, but recent gene-based phylogenies show that they contribute to all nine eukaryote subdomains. The former kingdoms of animals, plants and fungi are now relegated to lower ranks within subdomains. Most unicellular protists respond to adverse conditions by differentiating into dormant walled cysts. As cysts, they survive long periods of starvation, drought and other environmental threats, only to re-emerge when conditions improve. For protists pathogens, the resilience of their cysts can prevent successful treatment or eradication of the disease. In this context, effort has been directed towards understanding the molecular mechanisms that control encystation. We here firstly summarize the prevalence of encystation across protists and next focus on Amoebozoa, where most of the health-related issues occur. We review current data on processes and genes involved in encystation of the obligate parasite Entamoeba histolytica and the opportunistic pathogen Acanthamoeba. We show how the cAMP-mediated signalling pathway that controls spore and stalk cell encapsulation in Dictyostelium fruiting bodies could be retraced to a stress-induced pathway controlling encystation in solitary Amoebozoa. We highlight the conservation and prevalence of cAMP signalling genes in Amoebozoan genomes and the suprisingly large and varied repertoire of proteins for sensing and processing environmental signals in individual species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据