4.6 Article

Inflammasome components caspase-1 and adaptor protein apoptosis-associated speck-like proteins are important in resistance to Cryptosporidium parvum

期刊

MICROBES AND INFECTION
卷 20, 期 6, 页码 369-375

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.micinf.2018.04.006

关键词

Cryptosporidium parvum; IL-18; IL-1 beta; Associated speck-like protein; Nod-like receptors; Inflammasome

资金

  1. Department of Veteran's Affairs (VA Merit Program) [BX000983]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cryptosporidium spp. are opportunistic protozoan parasites that infect epithelial cells in the intestinal tract and cause a flu-like diarrheal illness. Innate immunity is key to limiting the expansion of parasitic stages early in infection. One mechanism in which it does this is through the generation of early cytokines, such as IL-18. The processing and secretion of mature IL-18 (and IL-1 beta) is mediated by caspase-1 which is activated within an inflammasome following the engagement of inflammasome-initiating sensors. We examined how the absence of caspase-1 and caspase-11, the adapter protein Asc, and other inflammasome components affects susceptibility to cryptosporidial infection by these and other key cytokines in the gut. We found that Casp-11(-/-)Casp(-/-) knockout mice have increased susceptibility to Cryptosporidium parvum infection as demonstrated by the 35-fold higher oocyst production (at peak infection) compared to wild-type mice. Susceptibility correlated with a lack of IL-18 in caspase-1 and caspase1/11 knockout mice, whereas IL-18 is significantly elevated in wildtype mice. IL-1 beta was not generated in any significant amount following infection nor was any increased susceptibility observed in IL-1 beta knockout mice. We also show that the adapter protein Asc is important to susceptibility, and that the caspase-1 canonical inflammasome signaling pathway is the dominant pathway in C. parvum resistance. (C) 2018 Institut Pasteur. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据