4.4 Review

Guidelines and considerations for the use of system suitability and quality control samples in mass spectrometry assays applied in untargeted clinical metabolomic studies

期刊

METABOLOMICS
卷 14, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11306-018-1367-3

关键词

Quality assurance (QA); Quality control (QC); System suitability samples; Pooled QC samples; Standard reference materials (SRMs); Long-term reference (LTR) QC samples

资金

  1. Medical Research Council in UK [MR/M009157/1]
  2. Western Australia Department of Health
  3. Instituto Carlos III (Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, Spain) [CP16/00034]
  4. MRC [MR/M009157/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) are two quality management processes that are integral to the success of metabolomics including their application for the acquisition of high quality data in any high-throughput analytical chemistry laboratory. QA defines all the planned and systematic activities implemented before samples are collected, to provide confidence that a subsequent analytical process will fulfil predetermined requirements for quality. QC can be defined as the operational techniques and activities used to measure and report these quality requirements after data acquisition. Aim of review This tutorial review will guide the reader through the use of system suitability and QC samples, why these samples should be applied and how the quality of data can be reported. Key scientific concepts of review System suitability samples are applied to assess the operation and lack of contamination of the analytical platform prior to sample analysis. Isotopically-labelled internal standards are applied to assess system stability for each sample analysed. Pooled QC samples are applied to condition the analytical platform, perform intra-study reproducibility measurements (QC) and to correct mathematically for systematic errors. Standard reference materials and long-term reference QC samples are applied for inter-study and inter-laboratory assessment of data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据