4.7 Article

Dynamic modeling of subcellular phenylpropanoid metabolism in Arabidopsis lignifying cells

期刊

METABOLIC ENGINEERING
卷 49, 期 -, 页码 36-46

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymben.2018.07.003

关键词

C-13 isotopic labeling; Kinetic modeling; Model selection; Phenylpropanoid metabolism; Lignin biosynthesis

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research, Genomic Science program [DE-SC0008628]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lignin is a polymer that significantly inhibits saccharification of plant feedstocks. Adjusting the composition or reducing the total lignin content have both been demonstrated to result in an increase in sugar yield from biomass. However, because lignin is essential for plant growth, it cannot be manipulated with impunity. Thus, it is important to understand the control of carbon flux towards lignin biosynthesis such that optimal modifications to it can be made precisely. Phenylalanine (Phe) is the common precursor for all lignin subunits and it is commonly accepted that all biosynthetic steps, spanning multiple subcellular compartments, are known, yet an in vivo model of how flux towards lignin is controlled is lacking. To address this deficiency, we formulated and parameterized a kinetic model based on data from feeding Arabidopsis thaliana basal lignifying stems with ring labeled [C-13(6)]-Phe. Several candidate models were compared by an information theoretic approach to select the one that best matched the experimental observations. Here we present a dynamic model of phenylpropanoid metabolism across several subcellular compartments that describes the allocation of carbon towards lignin biosynthesis in wild-type Arabidopsis stems. Flux control coefficients for the enzymes in the pathway starting from arogenate dehydratase through 4-coumarate: CoA ligase were calculated and show that the plastidial cationic amino-acid transporter has the highest impact on flux.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据