期刊
MEDICINE
卷 97, 期 13, 页码 -出版社
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010137
关键词
bleeding risk; leukemia; PLT; thromboelastography
资金
- Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [LY18C090004]
- Science and Technology Planning Project of Zhejiang Province, China [2017C33197, LGF18H090009]
- National Natural Science Foundation [81371350, 31671071, 81570198, 81571190]
- Medical and Health Science and Technology Project of Zhejiang Province [2018257543, 2018271239]
This study aimed to compare the efficacy of thromboelastography (TEG) and conventional coagulation methods in predicting hemorrhage risk in patients with leukemia.A total of 226 patients diagnosed with leukemia were included and divided into bleeding and nonbleeding groups. All patients had their blood samples taken for TEG test to measure the reaction time (R time), alpha ( angle), and maximum amplitude (MA) as well as measure platelet count (PLT), prothrombin time, and activated partial thromboplastin time. Patients were followed up for bleeding episodes.The multivariate analysis showed that PLT [odds ratio (OR)=0.993] and MA (OR=0.921) have better association with bleeding risk. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that the combination of PLT and MA (AUC=0.824) was better for hemorrhage risk prediction than PLT [area under the curve (AUC)=0.730] and MA (AUC=0.819) alone.The combination of TEG and conventional coagulation methods could help in assessing the risk of hemorrhage in patients with leukemia.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据