4.5 Article

The EPA-based Utrecht undergraduate clinical curriculum: Development and implementation

期刊

MEDICAL TEACHER
卷 40, 期 5, 页码 506-513

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1435856

关键词

-

资金

  1. EU's Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development, and demonstration [619349]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim: As reports of the application of entrustable professional activities (EPAs) increase, not only for postgraduate but also for undergraduate medical education, there is a need for descriptions of what a UME curriculum with EPAs could look like. We provide such a description based on the experiences at University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands, which can be used as an example by other curriculum developers. Methods: In a three-year process, the UMC Utrecht Curriculum Committee developed a clinical workplace curriculum with an EPA structure, taking into account examples, such as the US Core EPAs for Entering Residency, and recommendations to integrate and increase the length of clerkships .Results: In the resulting curriculum, operational from 2016, students train to be trusted with indirect supervision before graduation in five broad EPAs: the clinical consultation; general medical procedures; informing, advising and guiding patients and families; communicating and collaborating with colleagues; and extraordinary patient care. Each of these integrates smaller (nested) EPAs that receive focused training attention in integrated clerkships at various moments and must be signed off for entrustment with indirect supervision to complete the clerkship. Discussion: The framework of EPAs went through many iterations before it was consolidated. Among the issues that required special attention was the application of a supervision levels scale for sign-off, the necessity to cover all relevant clinical content while not labeling too many small tasks each as a separate EPA, methods of EPA-focused assessment in the workplace and the creation of an e-portfolio model to serve assessment and entrustment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据