4.1 Article

Dosimetric evaluation of MLC-based dynamic tumor tracking radiotherapy using digital phantom: Desired setup margin for tracking radiotherapy

期刊

MEDICAL DOSIMETRY
卷 43, 期 1, 页码 74-81

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2017.08.005

关键词

Radiotherapy; Dynamic tumor tracking radiotherapy; Setup margin; Four-dimensional dose calculation; Stereotactic body radiotherapy

资金

  1. Varian Medical Systems (Palo Alto, CA, USA)
  2. JSPS KAKENHI [25293258, 15J05402, 15K19765]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17K17582, 26860970, 25293258, 15J05402, 15K19765, 17H04117] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the dosimetric impact of the margin on the multileaf collimator-based dynamic tumor tracking plan. Furthermore, an equivalent setup margin (EM) of the tracking plan was determined according to the gated plan. A 4-dimensional extended cardiac-torso was used to create 9 digital phantom datasets of different tumor diameters (TDs) of 1, 3, and 5 cm and motion ranges (MRs) of 1, 2, and 3 cm. For each dataset, respiratory gating (30% to 70% phase) and tumor tracking treatment plans were prepared using 8-field 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy by 4-dimensional dose calculation. The total lung V20 was calculated to evaluate the dosimetric impact for each case and to estimate the EM with the same impact on lung V20 obtained with the gating plan with a setup margin of 5 mm. The EMs for (TD = 1 cm, MR = 1 cm}, {TD = 1 cm, MR = 2 cm}, and {TD = 1 cm, MR = 3 cm} were estimated as 5.00, 4.16, and 4.24 mm, respectively. The EMs for (TD = 5 cm, MR = 1 cm}, (TD = 5 cm, MR = 2 cm}, and {TD = 5 cm, MR = 3 cm} were estimated as 4.24 mm, 6.35 mm, and 7.49 mm, respectively. This result showed that with a larger MR, the EM was found to be increased. In addition, with a larger TD, the EM became smaller. Our result showing the EMs provided the desired accuracy for multileaf collimator-based dynamic tumor tracking radiotherapy. (C) 2017 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据