4.5 Article

Cytokines Produced by Lymphocytes in the Incompetent Great Saphenous Vein

期刊

MEDIATORS OF INFLAMMATION
卷 2018, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2018/7161346

关键词

-

资金

  1. Medical University of Silesia [KNW-2-056/D/6/N, KNW 1-039/K/6/1, KNW-1-037/K/7/I]
  2. project Silesian BIO-FARM-Centre for Biotechnology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The pathogenesis of chronic venous disease (CVD) remains unclear, but lately inflammation is suggested to have an important role in its development. This study is aimed at assessing cytokines released by lymphocytes in patients with great saphenous vein (GSV) incompetence. In 34 patients exhibiting oscillatory flow (reflux) in GSV, blood was derived from the cubital vein and from the incompetent sapheno-femoral junction. In 12 healthy controls, blood was derived from the cubital vein. Lymphocyte culture with and without stimulation by phytohemagglutinin (PHA) was performed. Interleukins (IL) 1 beta, 2, 4, 10, 12 (p70), and 17A; interleukin 1 receptor alpha (IL-1ra); tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha); interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma); and RANTES were assessed in culture supernatants by the Bio-Plex assay. In both stimulated and unstimulated samples, in the examined group, IL-1 beta and IFN-gamma had higher concentrations and RANTES had lower concentrations when compared to those in the control group. In the examined group, IL-4 and IL-17A had higher concentrations without stimulation and TNF-alpha had higher concentrations with stimulation. The GSV samples had higher IL-2, IL-4, IL-12 (p70), and IFN-gamma concentrations without stimulation and lower IL-2 and TNF-alpha concentrations with stimulation when compared to those of the upper limb in the examined group. These observations indicate that the oscillatory flow present in incompetent veins causes changes in the cytokine production by lymphocytes, promoting a proinflammatory profile. However, the relations between immunological cells, cytokines, and the endothelium require more insight.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据