4.2 Article

Exploration of the experiences of young mothers seeking and accessing health services

期刊

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02646838.2013.832181

关键词

young mothers; support; stigmatisation; self-stigmatisation; Husserl phenomenology; experiences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The objective was to explore young mothers' experiences of seeking and accessing health services, specifically maternity care. Study design: A phenomenological approach underpinned by the work of Husserl and guided by the framework offered by Giorgi. Participants: A purposive sample of seven young mothers took part in audio-recorded unstructured interviews in either the young mother's home or in a private room at their GP practice. Findings: Six themes emerged from the initial thematic analysis: (1) feeling abandoned, (2) information is vital, (3) feeling judged, (4) family and friends, (5) interference, (6) younger mothers need additional support. After bracketing' the preconceptions evident in the initial analysis, essential themes describing the young mothers' experience of accessing healthcare were identified: (1) the need for support and information; (2) fear of stigmatisation and stigmatisation of self. Conclusions: The young mothers in this study experienced a need for support and information, which reflects the findings of previous studies. This study has added to the knowledge base as it also found that these young mothers were hindered from obtaining or making use of available support and information through fear or expectation of stigmatisation and self-stigmatisation. There is a need to improve availability of support and information for young mothers, who may benefit from one-to-one education to help them gain confidence to deal with pregnancy and parenthood issues. Further research on young mothers' perceptions of maternity service provision will advance understanding of young mothers' help and support needs during pregnancy, birth and the postnatal period.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据