4.7 Article

Statistical analysis of colour changes in tempera paints mock-ups exposed to urban and marine environment

期刊

MEASUREMENT
卷 118, 期 -, 页码 298-310

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2017.06.037

关键词

Tempera paint mock-ups; Egg yolk; Rabbit glue; Vectorial analysis; Functional analysis; Outdoor exposure

资金

  1. European Regional Development Fund-Belgium (ERDF)
  2. Andalusian Research Group [RNM-179]
  3. Spanish Research Project EXPOAIR [P12-FQM-1889]
  4. Spanish Research Project AERIMPACT [CGL2012-30729]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study is the exploration of the suitability of two different statistical approaches (vectorial and functional analyses), which go beyond a purely descriptive statistics, in order to identify trends and similarities in colour changes of several tempera mock-ups paints during thirteen months. The samples were subjected under an outdoor exposure to a natural urban atmosphere characterized by an important marine and industrial influence. The changes of the colour were measured in CIE L*a*b* and CIE L*C*h colour spaces The paint mock-ups were binary mixtures made with either egg yolk or rabbit glue binder, mixed with one of the seven pigments studied, some of which have different grain sizes. Two different statistical analyses - vectorial and functional - were performed in order to detect the different colour change evolution among the temperas during the exposure time. The functional approach revealed more useful information than the vectorial (classic) one. Paints containing haematite, lapis lazuli and (standard grain size) azurite exhibited different trends of the colour parameters in comparison with the rest of the paints. Stereomicroscopy, X-ray diffraction and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy showed that the binder composition and especially its stability to outdoor exposure, are the factors responsible for the statistically significant colour changes detected. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据