4.5 Article

Metabolic changes in cancer cells upon suppression of MYC

期刊

CANCER & METABOLISM
卷 1, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/2049-3002-1-7

关键词

MYC; Glutaminolysis; Glucose; Glutamine; Oncogene addiction; Mitochondrial ROS; Mitochondrial metabolism

资金

  1. NIH [R01CA123067, R01CA157996, R01CA089305, R01CA34233]
  2. Robert A Welch Foundation [I1733]
  3. ARM from NIH Training [5T32GM083831]
  4. JMM [SAF2010-17573, CVI- 6656]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Cancer cells engage in aerobic glycolysis and glutaminolysis to fulfill their biosynthetic and energetic demands in part by activating MYC. Previous reports have characterized metabolic changes in proliferating cells upon MYC loss or gain of function. However, metabolic differences between MYC-dependent cancer cells and their isogenic differentiated counterparts have not been characterized upon MYC suppression in vitro. Results: Here we report metabolic changes between MYC-dependent mouse osteogenic sarcomas and differentiated osteoid cells induced upon MYC suppression. While osteogenic sarcoma cells increased oxygen consumption and spare respiratory capacity upon MYC suppression, they displayed minimal changes in glucose and glutamine consumption as well as their respective contribution to the citrate pool. However, glutamine significantly induced oxygen consumption in the presence of MYC which was dependent on aminotransferases. Furthermore, inhibition of aminotransferases selectively diminished cell proliferation and survival of osteogenic sarcoma MYCexpressing cells. There were minimal changes in ROS levels and cell death sensitivity to reactive oxygen species (ROS)-inducing agents between osteoid cells and osteogenic sarcoma cells. Nevertheless, the mitochondrial-targeted antioxidant Mito-Vitamin E still diminished proliferation of MYC-dependent osteogenic sarcoma cells. Conclusion: These data highlight that aminotransferases and mitochondrial ROS might be attractive targets for cancer therapy in MYC-driven tumors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据