4.7 Article

Solar photo-Fenton oxidation against the bioresistant fractions of winery wastewater

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2013.07.008

关键词

Membrane bioreactor; Post-treatment; Solar photo-Fenton oxidation; Winery wastewater

资金

  1. European Union [LIFE08 ENV/CY/000455]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work examined the solar- photo Fenton oxidation against the bioresistant fractions of winery wastewater. Winery effluents already treated by a membrane bioreactor (MBR) were subjected to further purification by solar photo-Fenton oxidation process (hv/Fe2+/H2O2). The effect of various operating variables, such as the catalyst and oxidant concentration, as well as temperature and solar irradiation on the abatement of chemical oxygen demand (COD), dissolved organic carbon (DOC), color, toxicity and phytotoxicity has been assessed. Optimum Fe2+ and H2O2 concentrations were found to be 3mg L (1) and 250 mg L (1), respectively. Solar photo- Fenton has been demonstrated to be an effective process for the purification of winery effluents, yielding after 120 min of treatment, COD, DOC and color removal of 70 +/- 3.3%, 53 +/- 3.7% and 75 +/- 2.2%, respectively. The residual COD and DOC values after the end of the solar treatment were 33 mg L (1) and 14.1 mg L (1), respectively. In the various operating conditions studied, the extent of mineralization (assessed by DOC) was lower than the COD decrease, implying that partial oxidation reactions of the organic content prevailed over total oxidation to CO2 and water. Moreover, the process efficiency was found to increase with temperature up to a point (similar to 70% at 25 degrees C), and then reach a plateau with a small increase by further increasing the temperature to 45 degrees C. Finally, the toxic and the phytotoxic compounds still present in the effluent after the biological treatment were reduced or even eliminated through solar photo- Fenton oxidation. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据